ELDERLY ABUSE IN INDIA AND USA: COMPARATIVE STUDY

Main Article Content

ARTI SHARMA, J. K. MITTAL

Abstract

According to estimates, there are over 5.5 million reports of elder abuse in the United States each year, making it a significant social and public health problem. Due to inconsistent methods and identification guidelines, as well as a lack of public awareness of the issue, it is challenging to identify and treat elders who have been abused. For the assessment and care of elderly people who have been mistreated, an interdisciplinary approach in cooperation with Adult Protective Services investigation is essential. Through social media, local news, and community education, healthcare practitioners, other professionals, and the general public can be more aware of this frequently ignored issue. Generally, persons who have attained the age of 65 or older are considered “elderly.” Aging is influenced by genetics, lifestyle, and overall health, although it differs for each individual. Indian law allows “elderly people” over 60 who cannot take care of themselves to receive social security benefits. In the modern world, it has been observed or reported that many elderly people are mistreated by their family members. This paper will explore the nuances of Elderly abuse in India and the USA.

Article Details

Section
Public Law
Author Biography

ARTI SHARMA, J. K. MITTAL

1Arti Sharma, 2Prof. Dr. J. K. Mittal

1 PhD Research Scholar under the supervision of Professor, Dr. J.K.Mittal, Amity Law School, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh

2Emeritus Professor, Amity Law School, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh

References

World Health Organization, Active ageing : a policy framework, (2002), https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/67215 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

World Economic Forum, Latin America World Economic Forum Building the platform for a Latin American decade, (2011), https://www3.weforum.org/docs/LA11/WEF_LA11_Report_PT.pdf.

OECD, Understanding the Digital Divide, (2001), https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/understanding-the-digital-divide_236405667766 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

josemanuel Robles et al., The new frontier of digital inequality: the participatory gap / The New Frontier of Digital Inequality. The Participatory Divide, 156 Revista Española de InvestigacionesSociológicas 97 (2016).Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, §2(h), No.56, Acts of Parliament, 2007 (India).

World Health Organization, supra note 1.

OECD, supra note 3.

Begoña Peral-Peral, Jorge Arenas-Gaitán & Ángel-Francisco Villarejo-Ramos, From the digital divide to the psycho-digital divide: the elderly and social networks, 23 Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación 57 (2015), https://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&numero=45&articulo=45-2015-06&idioma=en (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

André S. de Souza, Qualitative research in administration: theory and practice, 11 Rev. adm. contemp. 235 (2007), http://www.scielo.br/j/rac/a/vsscPvSCtNH3pNkQPJKfd9K/?lang=pt (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Michael Braun, Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults, 29 Computers in Human Behavior 673 (2013).

JANETE LARA DE OLIVEIRA Bertucci, BASIC METHODOLOGY FOR THE PREPARATION OF COURSE COMPLETION PAPERS (TCC) (1st EDITION ed. 2008), https://www.martinsfontespaulista.com.br/metodologia-basica-para-elaboracao-de-trabalhos-de-conclusao-de-cursos--tcc--516483/p (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Walter R. Boot et al., Computer proficiency questionnaire: assessing low and high computer proficient seniors, 55 Gerontologist 404 (2015).

M. E. de Bruijn, F. Nyamnjoh & I. Brinkman, Mobile phones: the new talking drums of everyday Africa (2009), https://hdl.handle.net/1887/22161 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

J. W Creswell, Research project: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods; Magda Lopes translation., 13 Cadernos de Linguagem e Sociedade 205 (2012), https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/les/article/view/11610 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Scott K. Radford, David M. Hunt & Deborah Andrus, Experiential Learning Projects: A Pedagogical Path to Macromarketing Education, 35 Journal of Macromarketing 466 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146715573834 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Geoffrey Miller, Darwin Goes Shopping: Sex, Evolution and Consumption: Sex, Evolution and Consumption (Elena Gaidano tran., 2a edição ed. 2012).

Simone Pettigrew & Michele Roberts, Addressing loneliness in later life, 12 Aging Ment Health 302 (2008).

Chaiwoo Lee & Joseph F. Coughlin, PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults’ Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers, 32 Journal of Product Innovation Management 747 (2015), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jpim.12176 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Patricia A. Tun & Margie E. Lachman, The Association Between Computer Use and Cognition Across Adulthood: Use it so You Won’t Lose it?, 25 Psychol Aging 560 (2010), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281759/ (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Yvonne Barnard et al., Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability, 29 Computers in Human Behavior 1715 (2013), https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563213000721 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Russell Belk, Qualitative Consumer and Marketing Research (1st edition ed. 1900).

Bernardo Figueiredo et al., Developing Markets? Understanding the Role of Markets and Development at the Intersection of Macromarketing and Transformative Consumer Research (TCR), 35 Journal of Macromarketing 257 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146714543524 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Colin Leslie Campbell, Carla Renee Ferraro & Sean James Sands, Segmenting consumer reactions to social network marketing, 48 European Journal of Marketing 432 (2014), https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/segmenting-consumer-reactions-to-social-network-marketing (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Correrio Brassilianse, Elderly population will triple by 2050 in Brazil, research reveals, Acervo (2016), https://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/economia/2016/08/30/internas_economia,546485/populacao-idosa-vai-triplicar-ate-2050-revela-pesquisa.shtml (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Rowena Hill, Lucy Betts & Sarah Gardner, Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion, 48 Computers in Human Behavior 415 (2015).

jose manuel Robles et al., The new frontier of digital inequality: the participatory gap / The New Frontier of Digital Inequality. The Participatory Divide, 156 Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 97 (2016).

Andrew H. Van de Ven, Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Illustrated edition ed. 2007).

Rana Mostaghel, Innovation and technology for the elderly: Systematic literature review, 69 Journal of Business Research 4896 (2016), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296316302120 (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Phylis M. Mansfield & Mary Beth Pinto, Consumer Vulnerability and Credit Card Knowledge Among Developmentally Disabled Citizens, 42 Journal of Consumer Affairs 425 (2008), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2008.00115.x (last visited Dec 22, 2021).

Rogers Everett, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition (5th edition ed. 2003).