A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES AND THE RELATING STATUTES

Main Article Content

BHANU GANGWAL, MAHESH KOOLWAL

Abstract

The Internet is a massive computer complex that has caused millions of deaths and served both as a force of protection and destruction. As all coins have two faces, another hand of Internet is that it had overwhelmed the population by making them authentic to such a base, and multitudinous fake malefactors were in control of the situation on a single face where everything from shopping to cooking to watching live sports events was made easier. In addition, a social networking community is a community which connects or adjoins one people or community with another people or community around the globe whose health and backgrounds are insolvable to distinguish. A healthy app like Facebook or LinkedIn allows a person to produce a particular runner that adjoins them to their given family or musketeers or like- inclined individualities and allows them to feel happy and proud. Advanced sweats to limit the internet usage for order and connecting on a following, ethical, educational, safety, and fresh base have redounded from the shocking shift in gregarious authority. These events have redounded in legal and limited sweats to reduce the pitfalls associated with this new normal, which include fraud, pornography, hacking, and hacking while druggies are alone, thinker property, public security, and stoner time alone. In this setting, the current exploration trouble is free to probe the use of social community networking websites and cyber security regulations in an applicable manner. In the present exploration bid, 100 repliers (scholars at universities in Jaipur, Rajasthan, India) who constantly use collaborative media gear for winning performance of their day- to- day lives were the subject of exploratory and regular cave into slant for data compendium and psychoanalysis. The views of the repliers were statistically anatomized using SPSS's One- Way ANOVA, and the issues redounded in a negative response to the null thesis and a positive response to the alternate thesis, which states that- H1- There's a significant association between the use of social networking spots and legal violations. The current study can be attributed to some of the well- known cases that made captions. The purpose of this study was to establish a link between the position of the collaborative medium and the specifics or reason for the prevalence in exaggerated statutory businesses.

Article Details

Section
Public Law
Author Biography

BHANU GANGWAL, MAHESH KOOLWAL

BHANU GANGWAL1, PORF. MAHESH KOOLWAL2
1 Ph.D. Scholar, School of Law, JECRC University, Jaipur
2Dean. School of Law, JECRC University, Jaipur

References

Ahn. K, Rajnathan W, (2013) ‘Social media: how the net is closing in on cyber bullies’ Ent. L.R. 263, 268

Anderson H, (2009) ‘A Privacy Wake-Up Call for Social Networking Sites?’ 20 Entertainment Law Review 7, 245

Beale J, (1983) ‘The Jurisdiction of a Sovereign State’ 36 Harv. L. Rev. 241

Counts C & Martin C, (1996) ‘Libel in Cyberspace: A Framework for Addressing Liability and Jurisdictional Issues in this New Frontier’ 59 Albany Law Review

Determann L & Sprague R(1999) , ‘Intrusive Monitoring: Employment Privacy Expectations Are Reasonable in Europe, Destroyed in the United States’ 26 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 979

Budak R. K.and Kanan L, (2012) ‘Social Media Privacy: A Dozen Myths and Facts’ Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 7-12

Elefant C, (2011) ‘The "power" of social media: legal issues & best practices for utilities Engaging social media’ Energy Law Journal, 112-113.

Goodrum A, (2013), ‘SNOPA and the PIPA: Do You Know What it means For You?’ Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 131

Flannery Z, (2010), ‘Regulation of the Internet: An Impossible Task?’ Galway Student L. Rev. 33-34

Levi L, (2012), ‘Social Media and the press’ North Carolina Law Review 90-95

Miller.S,(2003)‘Prescriptive Jurisdiction over Internet Activity: The Need to Define and Establish the Boundaries of Cyber liberty’ Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 33-35

Paslawsky A, (2012) ‘The growth of social media norms and governments attempts at regulation’ Fordham Int'l L.J. 1485-1486

Randall K, (1988) 'Universal jurisdiction under international law’ Tex. L. Rev. 785

Rylich J, (2008) ‘Buzzword the (R)Evolution of The Web’ MASARYK U. J.L. & Tech. 177

Sachdeva A, (2007) ‘International Jurisdiction in Cyberspace’ C.T.L.R. 245

Sardar S & Shah B(2012), Social Media, ‘Censorship, and Control: Beyond SOPA, PIPA, and The Arab Spring’ 15 Univ. of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change 577

Strutin K, (2011) ‘Social Media and the Vanishing Points of Ethical and Constitutional Boundaries’ Pace L. Rev. 228

Yntema H, (1996) ‘The Comity Doctrine’, 65 Mich. L. Rev. , 19

WEBLIOGRAPHY

Ali M, ‘Student arrested for Facebook post about Azam Khan’ (The Hindu, 18 March 2015) <http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/bareilly-boy-arrested-for-attributing-objectionable-statement-to-azam-khan-in-facebook-post/article7007393.ece> accessed on 19 March 2015

Bowcott O, ‘Twitter joke trial: Paul Chambers wins high court appeal against conviction’(The Gaurdian, Friday 27 July 2012 10.09) <http://www.theguardian.com/law/2012/jul/27/twitter-joke-trial-high-court> accessed 18 December 2014

Collins G, ‘UK: Social Media – The IP Angle’ (Mondaq, 17 November 2010) <http://www.mondaq.com/x/115844/Trademark/Social+Media+The+IP+Angle> accessed on 14 Nov. 2013

Sharma P, ‘Core Characteristics of Web 2.0 Service’s (Tech Pluto Staff, 28 Nov. 2008) <http://www.techpluto.com/web-20-services/> accessed 23 February 2013

Thomas T, ‘Google, Facebook should share revenue with us: Airtel’ (The Hindu Business Line, 20 July 2012) <http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/thomas-k-thomas/google-facebook-should-share-revenue-with-us-airtel/article3662533.ece> accessed on 27 Sept. 2014

White N, ‘Net Neutrality and the Future of the Internet’ (The Huffington Post, 03 May 2014) accessed on 16 January 2015

Wolfe J, ‘What's the Impact of gTLDs on Social Media?’ (Clickz, 11 September 2013) accessed 10 January 2015

Woodward A, ‘Viewpoint: Changing the way the internet is governed is risky’ (BBC News, 14 June 2012) accessed on 15 January 2015