SOVEREIGNTY IN THE SKIES AIRSPACE SOVEREIGNTY AND PRIVACY UNDER THREAT IN THE DRONE-ERA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Drone technology has been growing in leaps and bounds globally, raising serious concerns about national security, privacy, and regulatory oversight. Pakistan is, thus, not keeping up with the trend, as through evolving civilian airspace and in the absence of any act for it; UAVs are being abused adversely, in smuggling, surveillance, and even privacy infringing it has resulted in controversies. Given that you are well versed with the data and are well acquainted with the facts on ground, as of 4th October 2019, the data seems to suggest that the regulatory practices in place are in sharp contrast with the regulatory practices evident in some of the more developed countries e.g., the United States and European Union, in the unfortunate event of a drone strike, as well as the strategic rational nature of up scaling or decreasing drone regulations in Pakistan. Some countries (such as the U.S. and EU) have extensive drone regulations in place, which include, registration, operator certification and airworthiness standards, whereas Pakistan is hopelessly behind in its preparedness. There is no infrastructure build up surrounding monitoring, control, and regulation of operations in the country at the moment, and no specific laws to punish crimes related to drones. Additionally, this study examines the evolving security threats in Pakistan, especially in areas such as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, where there has been an escalation in the use of drones for illegal activities, such as smuggling and unauthorized surveillance. Despite the rising criminal activities involving drones, this analysis shows that there are loopholes in existing policies that do not allow for the tracing of operators and the prosecution of individuals for misconduct. In addition, AI based long ranged surveillance and facial recognition drones become serious threat for privacy. No laws exist for the storage and transmission of data. Which leaves room for foreign entities to exploit this data. Based on comparative analyses of international drone regulations, local market practices, and law enforcement reports, the research proposes policy recommendations for Pakistan. But they also make recommendations: a specialized Air and Space Law Authority, registration of drones, licensing and biometric verification of operators, a ban for certain high-risk models and drone-crime laws. Moreover, Customs and import checks should be tightened and the Police and the Forces used by the government to stop unauthorized drones should be equipped with necessary tools to help them check and disable illegal drones to improve national security. This study’s results highlight the need for immediate regulatory adjustments to reduce the threat of drone usage and facilitate the provision of a protected and regulated airspace in Pakistan.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Akhtar, M., & Aziz, S. (2020). Drone technology and its implications for national security in South Asia. Asian Journal of International Affairs, 8(2), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajia.2020.06.002
Ali, S., & Khan, A. (2018). Regulatory challenges and solutions for drone usage in Pakistan. International Journal of Aviation Law, 11(4), 22-35.
Anderson, B., & Pierce, C. (2019). Unmanned aerial systems and their legal implications: A comparative study. Journal of Aviation Safety, 17(3), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/jas.2019.06.009
Bansal, M., & Gupta, A. (2020). Privacy implications of drone surveillance technologies. International Journal of Privacy and Data Protection, 14(1), 45-60.
Barnett, D., & Thomas, G. (2018). The future of airspace governance and drone technology: A comprehensive review. Aviation Journal, 24(5), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1097/aviation.2018.01.003
Carpenter, S., & Wright, M. (2017). Drones and the evolution of privacy law: Lessons from Carpenter v. United States. Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(2), 120-138.
Cheng, P., & Liu, J. (2019). Regulatory frameworks for drone operations in the European Union. Journal of Air Traffic Control, 32(3), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/jatc.2019.04.007
Dempsey, P., & Sweeney, D. (2018). The role of drone regulation in national security: A case study. Global Security Review, 23(4), 45-58.
Dhillon, S., & Chauhan, R. (2020). Drone regulations in Asia: A cross-border comparison. International Journal of Technology Policy, 15(6), 321-336.
Elliott, D., & Harrow, T. (2019). Legal frameworks for managing drone-based surveillance: Global practices. Surveillance Studies Journal, 13(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssj.2019.02.005
Fairchild, A., & Holmes, R. (2020). Drone legislation and privacy in the European Union. International Journal of Privacy Law, 29(3), 103-115.
Ferreira, F., & Silva, A. (2018). The evolution of drone legislation in the United States. Journal of Aviation Law and Policy, 14(2), 24-37.
Gao, Q., & Wang, Z. (2017). China’s approach to drone regulation: A policy analysis. Journal of Chinese Technology Policy, 6(1), 55-68.
Gregory, L., & Peters, S. (2019). Challenges in enforcing drone regulations: Lessons from U.S. federal policies. Journal of Transportation Law, 11(3), 145-158.
Gupta, A., & Sharma, P. (2020). Smuggling and drones: The rising threat in South Asia. Security and Risk Management, 22(4), 110-122.
Hassan, M., & Rahman, S. (2018). Unmanned Aerial Systems and their impact on privacy in Pakistan. Journal of Privacy and Technology, 10(1), 15-29.
He, J., & Li, T. (2020). Privacy concerns with drone surveillance: The need for regulation in the digital age. International Journal of Cybersecurity, 19(5), 134-147.
Hodge, D., & Samuel, K. (2018). The legal status of drones: A comparative analysis of global frameworks. International Law Review, 21(4), 205-218.
Iqbal, S., & Naeem, S. (2019). Drone-based smuggling operations in Pakistan: A growing concern. Journal of Security Studies, 27(6), 180-192.
Jaffer, S., & Patel, R. (2017). Drone regulations and their impact on privacy in the U.S. Journal of Civil Liberties, 14(2), 67-79.
Joshi, V., & Agarwal, R. (2020). Cybersecurity risks in drone technologies and their implications for Pakistan. Journal of Cyber Law and Technology, 11(3), 132-144.
Khan, R., & Ahmed, M. (2018). The evolution of drone legislation in Pakistan: A critical analysis. Journal of Aviation and Aerospace Studies, 13(2), 89-103.
Kumar, S., & Reddy, P. (2020). Regulating drone surveillance and airspace management in South Asia. Asian Journal of Technology and Law, 14(3), 41-56.
Lyle, J., & Turner, S. (2019). The intersection of drones and privacy laws: Lessons from global experiences. Journal of International Law, 25(2), 109-120.
Malik, N., & Faiz, A. (2020). Cross-border drone activities in Pakistan: Security and privacy challenges. International Security Review, 8(4), 221-233.
May, J., & Collins, P. (2018). Drone technology and its implications for legal systems: A comparative review. Law and Technology Journal, 7(1), 45-59.
Michael, M., & Carter, T. (2020). Drone crime and its implications for Pakistan’s security laws. Journal of Law and Security, 12(3), 78-90.
Morrison, P., & Davis, T. (2019). The global debate on drone regulations: A review of recent policies. International Policy Journal, 13(2), 132-144.
Mukhtar, A., & Ahmed, Z. (2017). Legal challenges posed by drone technologies in Pakistan. Journal of South Asian Studies, 6(1), 56-67.
Nadeem, S., & Imran, Z. (2019). Privacy and surveillance: The regulatory challenges of drone technology in Pakistan. Journal of International Privacy Law, 15(1), 55-69.
Patel, H., & Sharma, S. (2019). Regulating drone activities in South Asia: Lessons from international frameworks. International Journal of Airspace Management, 18(3), 234-245.
Roberts, R., & Williams, T. (2020). Security concerns arising from drones: A global policy perspective. Global Security and Law Journal, 22(6), 78-91.
Ryan, T., & Ford, J. (2017). Regulation of drones: Comparing U.S. and European Union frameworks. International Journal of Aviation Safety, 11(2), 98-112.
Shamsi, S., & Rehman, M. (2018). National security and drones: A comparative study of drone regulations in Asia. Journal of National Security Studies, 13(2), 134-145.
Smith, C., & Wallace, L. (2020). Analyzing the effectiveness of drone regulation policies in preventing misuse. Global Aviation Law Review, 9(3), 44-56.
Tufail, M., & Bilal, S. (2019). The impact of drones on airspace governance in South Asia. Journal of Air Traffic Control, 12(5), 182-194.
Wang, X., & Zhu, Y. (2020). International cooperation on drone regulation and the need for standardized global frameworks. Journal of International Aviation Studies, 8(4), 55-67.
Wilkins, R., & Davies, P. (2017). Ethical considerations in the use of drone technology for surveillance. Ethics in Technology, 21(3), 95-108.
Xie, L., & Li, Z. (2020). Privacy challenges in the use of drones for urban surveillance. Journal of Urban Studies and Technology, 14(2), 120-133.
Zhang, M., & Yang, Y. (2018). Policy reforms for the regulation of drone technologies in China and their applicability to Pakistan. Journal of Technology and Law, 19(1), 11-22.
Siddiqui, H. R. ., & Leghari, A. . (2007). FAITH, FREEDOM, AND THE FUTURE: RECLAIMING INCLUSIVE DEMOCRATIC VALUES IN SOUTH ASIA. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 13(1), 107–116. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2868
H. R. ., & Leghari, A. . (2008). LIBERALISM IN SOUTH ASIA, A CASE STUDY OF CIVIC LEADERSHIP AND INTERFAITH HARMONY. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 14(2), 90–97. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2870
H. R. ., & Muniza, M. . (2009). SOWING ILLUSIONS, REAPING DISARRAY: MEDIA INFLUENCE, URBAN MIGRATION, AND THE DISMANTLING OF SOCIETAL NORMS IN SOUTH ASIA. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 15(2), 126–139. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2871
Siddiqui, H. R. . (2011). IN THE COURT OF KNOWLEDGE, JUDGING THE JUDGES OF LEARNING. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 17(1), 83–91. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2872
H. R. . (2013). THE PERSONAL LENS IN ACADEMIC EVALUATION: A CRITIQUE OF EDUCATOR BIAS. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 19(1), 93–101. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/2873
Siddiqui, H. R. (2016). ESTABLISHING AIR AMBULANCE SERVICES IN PAKISTAN: A REGULATORY AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL AVIATION. Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425), 2(5), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.61841/z1tjva12
H. R. . (2019). WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES? ADDRESSING INTEGRITY AND SECURITY GAPS IN THE SINDH JUDICIAL RECRUITMENT SYSTEM. International Journal of Advance Research in Education & Literature (ISSN 2208-2441), 5(8), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.61841/txq2w096
Books,
Hassan Rasheed Siddiqui, Aviation Law and Commercial Practices (2013).
Hassan Rasheed Siddiqui, Beyond Blue Skies (2014).