FORMATIVE EVALUATION TO STRENGTHEN EVALUATIVE PRACTICE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE LAW PROGRAMME OF THE CENTRAL UNIT OF VALLE DEL CAUCA - UCEVA.

Main Article Content

JESUS DANIEL ESPAÑA SARRIA , JORGE LUIS RESTREPO PIMIENTA , HERMES EMILIO MARTINEZ BARRIOS

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to design a formative assessment proposal that strengthens the evaluative practices of the teachers in the UCEVA Law program. The methodology was oriented, from the parameters of the interpretative paradigm and using the hermeneutic phenomenological method proposed by Fuster (2019), to interpret the arguments presented by Ausubel (2002), Quintar (2008), Santos (1998), Díaz (2000), Hidalgo (2021), Novak and Gowin (2002), and Álvarez (2013), who argue that, in higher education, the aim is to enhance competencies, skills, abilities, and dimensions of the human being, encompassing psychological, cultural, social, biological, ethical, communicative, and cognitive aspects. The data collection technique used was the interview, applied to 20 informants, and 3 work guides applied to 10 students, 6 teachers, and 4 graduates.


The results and findings obtained evidenced the need to apply formative assessment to improve student learning outcomes through reflection, feedback, and knowledge exchange. Likewise, the need to incorporate more assessment instruments and techniques other than exams and quizzes was identified.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v10i4.4449

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Aguilar, G. F. (2019). The methodological proposal as an alternative for knowledge integration. Catedra Magazine, Cátedra Magazine, 2(2), pp. 90-106, May-August https://doi.org/10.29166/catedra.v2i2.1708

Álvarez, M., (2013). Understanding classroom assessment in higher education: initial approaches from joint research. UCEVA case. In DA González, and MA Arce, (Eds.), Faces of learning evaluation in higher education, reflections from a joint investigation, the voice of teachers (pp. 45-83) Cali: Universidad San Buenaventura.

Ausubel, D. (2002). Acquisition and retention of knowledge. Barcelona: Paidós.

Ávila, M. D. (2015). Improvement plan for the articulation of education. Colombia: Universidad de la Sabana.

Cifuentes G. R. (2016). Didactics at the university: Perspectives from teaching. Colombia: La Salle University.

De Zubiría, S. J. (2015). Pedagogical models towards a dialogic pedagogy. Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.

Díaz, B. A. (2000). The Exam: texts for its history and debate. Mexico: Plaza and Valdés.

Díaz, B. A. (2002). Individual evaluation to an integrated social evaluation Mexico: Autonomous University of Mexico.

Díaz, B. A. (2017). From individual evaluation to an evaluation. Mexico: Autonomous University of Mexico.

Fuster, D. E. (2019). Qualitative research: Hermeneutic phenomenological method. Purposes and Representations, 7(1), 201-229. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267

Guzmán, J. (2011). The quality of teaching in higher education What is good teaching at this educational level? Educational Profiles Magazine vol. 33 Mexico City. IISUE-UNAM

Habermas, J. (1999). Theory of Communicative Action. Bogotá, Colombia: Taurus.

Hidalgo A. M. (2021). Reflections on formative evaluation in the university context. International Journal of Pedagogy and Educational Innovation, 1(1), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.51660/ripie.v1i1.32.

Ministry of National Education. (13 of 12, 2021). Ministry of National Education. Recovered in 2023, from the Ministry of National Education: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1780/articles-345822_ANEXO_18.pdf

Morin, E. (2012). Complex thinking. Obtained from http://cursoenlineasincostoedgarmorin.org/images/descargables/Morin_Introduccion_al_pensamiento_complejo.pdf

Moreno. (2017). The pedagogy of empowerment is a challenge for an institutionalized subject. Manizales, Colombia: University of Manizales.

Not, L. (1983). Interstructuring Dialogue Pedagogical Model: How to investigate in research. Magisterium Publishing House. Colombia.

Novak and Gowin. (2002). Learning to learn. Barcelona, Spain: Martínez Roca Editions.

Pérez, P. A and Tabernero, S.B. (2008). Formative and shared evaluation in teaching, university and the European Higher Education Area: key issues for its implementation. Education Magazine (347), September-December 2008, pp. 435-451

Prieto, N. L. (2008). Problem solving how to acquire and put into practice professional skills in the university context. In University teaching focused on learning. Spain: Octaedro editions.

Quintar, E. (2008). Non-parametric teaching. Colombia: Paidós.

Santos, G. M. (1998). To evaluate is to understand. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Terán et al. (2021). Learning strategies and students' motivation for entrepreneurial activity: exploratory research course of the career of the autonomous regional university. University and society | Scientific Magazine of the University of Cienfuegos, 12.

UCEVA. (2020). Institutional Educational Project - PEI. Tuluá, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Retrieved from https://www.uceva.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/pei-uceva-2020.pdf

UCEVA. (2021). Educational Program Project - PEP. Tuluá: UCEVA. Retrieved from https://www.uceva.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/PEPDerecho.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S. (2010). Thought and Language. Spain: Paidos Iberica.