COMPARATIVE INSIGHT INTO INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAWS OF THE DPR KOREA, CHINA AND RUSSIA: FOCUSING ON ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the present time, commercial exchange and cooperation among the DPR Korea, China and Russia are constantly expanding, which in turn leads to increase in commercial disputes among legal and natural persons of these three countries. Such disputes, in large part, are resolved through arbitral procedures rather than civil litigation, and arbitral procedures are preconditioned by arbitration agreements. The entire process ranging from its inception to the award originates in the agreement of the parties. The rules regarding arbitration agreements specified in international commercial arbitration laws of the DPR Korea, China and Russia share much in common, but differ in certain aspects.
The present paper aims at offering correct understanding of the arbitration agreement rules provided in international commercial arbitration laws of the countries so that the legal or natural persons of the DPR Korea, China and Russia can resolve commercial disputes in an informed and more rational way. The paper provides a comparative analysis of the arbitration agreement rules of the international commercial arbitration laws of the three countries and explores the common features and differences of the rules on the basis of outlining the development of the national legislation on arbitration agreements in the DPR Korea, China and Russia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Annie X Li, Challenges and Opportunities of Chinese International Arbitral Institutions and Courts in a New Era of Cross-border Dispute Resolution, 38 (2) Boston University International Law Journal 358 (2020).
Kotelnikov, The Arbitration Agreement In A. Kotelnikov, S. Kurochkin, and O. Skvortsov, Arbitration in Russia (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, chapter 3, 2019)
Ekaterina Rusakova, Evgenia Frolova, Ulvi Ocaqli and Ekaterina Kupchina, Possibilities Of Enforcement Procedure Of Foreign Arbitral Awards In Russian Federation And People’S Republic Of China, Proceedings of ADVED 2019- 5th International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences 288 (Istanbul, Turkey, 21-23 October 2019), ISBN: 978-605-82433-7-8 285.
Ge Liu and Alexander Lourie, International Commercial Arbitration in China: History, New Developments, and Current Practice 28 (3) Journal of Marshall Law Review 545 (1995).
Joao Ribeiro and Stephanie Teh. The Time for a New Arbitration Law in China: Comparing the Arbitration Law in China with the UNCITRAL Model Law, 34 Journal of International Arbitration 459, 481 (2017).
Karen Halverson. Resolving Economic Disputes in Russia's Market Economy, 18 (1) Michigan Journal of International Law 77 (1996).
Nigel Blackby and Constantine Partasides, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration 85 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
P.M. Mintz, Treteiskaia Sdelka i Treteiskii Sud [Agreements to Arbitrate and Arbitration], ZHURNAL MINISTERSTVA IUSTITSII, 1917, Nos. 5-6, at 154, 189.
Arbitration Provisions of the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission, Act of Sept. 12, 1988, 2 CHINA L. FOR FOREIGN Bus. REG. (CCH) 10-505, at 12,821.
김성호 등, 《법학전서(국제경제법부문)》[Song Ho Kim, Compendium of Laws: Economic International Law] 327 (Pyongyang, Science Encyclopedia Publishing House, 2014).
赵秀文, 《中国商事仲裁法原理与案例教程》[Xiuwen Zhao, Principles of Chinese Commercial Arbitration Law and Case Study] 118 (Law Publishing House, 2010), ISBN 978-7-300-09310-9/D 1810.