ASSESSMENT OF THE STATE OF INDIGENOUS JUSTICE SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EXPERIENCE IN COLOMBIA AND ECUADOR WITH THE SPECIAL INDIGENOUS JURISDICTION

Abstract

A systematic review was carried out on the production and publication of research papers related to the study of the Special Indigenous Jurisdiction variable under the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) approach. The purpose of the analysis proposed in this document was to know the main characteristics of the publications registered in the Scopus and Wos databases during the study and their scope in the study of the proposed variables, achieving the identification of 33 publications in total. Thanks to this first identification, it was possible to refine the results through the keywords entered in the search button of both platforms, which were SPECIAL INDIGENOUS JURISDICTION. The analysis was applied to a total of 14 documents, after excluding duplicates and those that were irrelevant to the main purpose of this document. The aim is to know, through the analysis of the literature, the variables that influence the tacit tension between the Ordinary Jurisdiction and the Special Indigenous Jurisdiction; The study focuses on the experiences of countries such as Colombia and Ecuador, without excluding that of neighboring countries in the Latin American community, with the purpose of identifying common aspects and the way in which these conflicts diminish from an analytical and scientific point of view. It is expected to evaluate indigenous justice systems from a descriptive approach based on the contribution of authors in that community.