EQUALITY AND NON-DISCRIMINATION: KEY PRINCIPLES IN PUBLIC LAW AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article delves into the foundational principles of equality and non-discrimination within the realms of public law and international human rights. Beginning with a historical overview, it traces the evolution of these principles, highlighting key milestones in their recognition and codification. Through an examination of the legal framework, including international treaties, domestic laws, and constitutional provisions, the article explores the mechanisms established to safeguard against discrimination. Special attention is given to the concept of intersectionality, illuminating how various factors intersect to compound discrimination against marginalized groups. Challenges and controversies surrounding the implementation and enforcement of equality and non-discrimination laws are analysed, alongside the role of the judiciary and enforcement mechanisms in addressing discrimination. Drawing on case studies and best practices, the article concludes with recommendations for promoting equality and fostering a culture of non-discrimination in both legal frameworks and societal attitudes.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2013). International human rights. Oxford University Press.
Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267-1273.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
Fredman, S. (2011). Human rights transformed: Positive rights and positive duties. Oxford University Press.
Gonzales, P. M., & Plaut, V. C. (2016). Organizational diversity ideologies: An integrative review and a reconceptualization. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 37(S1), S79-S94.
Kang, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Fair measures: A behavioural realist revision of affirmative action. California Law Review, 94(4), 1063-1118.
Mill, J. S. (1869). The subjection of women. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
Sullivan, L., & McGuire, M. (2010). Enacting an antiracist future: An introduction. Law & Inequality, 28, 1-6.
United States Constitution. Amend. XIV, § 1.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
United Nations. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783.
Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267-1273.