BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE AND CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION THAT HARM THE FINANCES OF THE INDONESIAN STATE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The emergence of various problems in the application of the principle of the Business Judgment Rule in Indonesia as well as the existence of the Board of Directors of SOEs who must be personally responsible for business decisions that are detrimental to the Indonesian state's finances. This study was conducted to determine the qualifications of actions that can be protected by the Business Judgment Rule principle or actions that can be subject to criminal acts of corruption that are detrimental to the Indonesian state finances. The research method used is normative juridical research conducted through library research and analyzed by qualitative research methods on the secondary data found. Data collection techniques through literature study. The results show that the SOE Directors in making their business decisions by the Business Judgment Rule principles must be freed from personal responsibility as long as the policy or business decision or transaction is carried out in good faith, with full prudence, and within the scope of their responsibilities and authorities. If there is one condition that is not met, the SOE Directors can be held personally accountable. In this case, a criminal act of corruption can be imposed because it has harmed the Indonesian state's finances.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Affandhi, F., Nasution, B., Siregar, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2016). Business Judgement Rule Dikaitkan dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi Badan USAha Milik Negara terhadap Keputusan Bisnis yang Diambil. USU Law Journal, 4(1), 33-44.
Affandhi, F., Nasution, B., Siregar, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2016). Business Judgement Rule Dikaitkan dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi Badan USAha Milik Negara terhadap Keputusan Bisnis yang Diambil. USU Law Journal, 4(1), 33-44.
Aji, P. S., & Hartiwiningsih, H. (2023). The Affirmation of SOE Finance as State Asset Which Management Is Separately in an Effort to Strengthen Evidence of Criminal Acts in SOEs. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(6), 493-505.
Akram, M. H., & Fanaro, N. P. (2019). Implementasi Doktrin Business Judgement Rule di Indonesia. Ganesha Law Review, 1(1), 77-87.
Ansari, T. (2019). Reminding State Owned Enterprises (BUMN) Management Using the Principle of’Business Judgment Rule’: A Preliminary Note. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 2(3), 27-38.
Bainbridge, S. M. (2004). The business judgment rule as abstention doctrine. Vanderbilt Law Review 57,(1): 81–130.
Bainbridge, S. M. (2004). The business judgment rule as abstention doctrine. Vand. L. Rev., 57, 83.
Brown, M. M., & Phillips, W. J. (1980). The Business Judgment Rule: Burks v. Lasker and Other Recent Developments. Journal Corporation Law, 6, 453.
Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (2004). The proper role of a target's management in responding to a tender offer. Economic Analysis of the Law: Selected Readings, 192-200.
Fajar, N. D., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme penelitian hukum: normatif & empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar.
Firmansyah, F., Santoso, T., Febrian, F., & Nashriana, N. (2020). Reconstruction to prove elements of detrimental to state finances in the criminal act of corruption in Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 8(3), 671-692.
Hartono, R. N., & Rini, W. S. D. (2021). Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dalam Perspektif Doktrin Business Judgement Rule. Keluwih: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), 23-32.
Hasiholan, T., Madjid, A., Aprilianda, N., & Kusumaningrum, A. (2023). Urgency of Regulation of Business Judgment Rule As A Reason For Criminal Deletion In Criminal Acts of Corruption. YURISDIKSI: Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains, 19(2), 147-168.
Hinsey IV, J. (1983). Business Judgment and the American Law Institute's Corporate Governance Project: the Rule the Doctrine and the Reality. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 52, 609.
Irawan, C. N., Pujiyono, P., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2022). Implementation of Business Judgement Rules in Indonesia: Theories, Practices, and Contemporary Cases. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 4(1), 1-24.
Isfardiyana, S. H. (2007). Tanggungawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas dalam Pelanggaran Fiduciary,” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 2, (158): 168–91.
Isfardiyana, S. H. (2017). Business Judgement Rule Oleh Direksi Perseroan. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 2(1), 1-20.
Larry. D. S. (1983). “The Law of Corporate Groups: Procedural Problemsin the Law of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations Philip I Blumberg. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company,” International Journal of Legal Information 12. (5) 268–69.
Lestari, R., Ikhwansyah, I., & Faisal, P. (2018). Konsistensi Pengukuhan Kedudukan Kekayaan Negara Yang Dipisahkan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara Menurut Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Doktrin Business Judgement Rule. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 1(2), 236-249.
Mahyani, A. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Pidana Direksi BUMN Yang Merugi. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(1), 1.
Manning, B. (1984). Business Judgement Rule in Overview, The. OHIO State Law Journal 45, 615.
Mayasari, D. E. (2014). Kedudukan BUMN Sebagai Kekayaan Negara Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 1(1).82-102.
Radjaguguk, E. (2006). Pengertian Keuangan Negara dan Kerugian Negara,” in Tetes Pemikiran 1971-2006. Depok: Lembaga Studi Hukum dan Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Salam, M. F. (2003). Pemberdayaan BUMN di Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.
Silondae, A. A., & Fathoedin, A. F. (2010). Aspek Hukum dalam Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Jakarta: Mitra Kencana Media.
Simbolon, A. (2018). Penerapan prinsip business judgement rule di Indonesia. SIPENDIKUM
Sjahdeni, S. R. (2001). Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Direksi dan Komisaris. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 14 (2) 23-34.
Soekanto, S. (2005). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarata: UI Press.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo.
Suhariyanto, B. (2018). Penerapan pidana uang pengganti kepada korporasi dalam perkara korupsi demi pemulihan kerugian keuangan negara. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 7(1), 113-130.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2009). Menghitung kerugian keuangan negara dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba.
Wijaya, A. (2020). Implementation of the Doctrine of the Business Judgment Rule on Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia. Yuridika, 35(1), 1-14.
Wijaya, I. S. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pengurus Badan Usaha Milik Negara Terhadap Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Pengelolaan Persero. CALYPTRA, 4(2), 1-21.