LANGUAGE EDUCATION DYNAMICS: EXPLORING THE CORRELATION BETWEEN TEACHERS' AND STUDENTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study conducts a comprehensive examination of the diverse methodologies employed in interpreting the Qur'an within the context of South Asia. The region's rich cultural, linguistic, and religious diversity has given rise to a plethora of interpretive approaches, reflecting the dynamism and complexity of Islamic scholarship in this geographic space. Through a critical lens, this analysis aims to unravel the various methodological trends that have emerged over time and assess their implications for the understanding and application of the Qur'anic text.The research delves into historical developments, exploring the evolution of Qur'anic interpretation in South Asia from early traditions to contemporary methodologies. It examines the impact of regional cultural influences, linguistic nuances, and theological perspectives on the interpretive frameworks adopted by scholars. By scrutinizing key works and prominent scholars, the study identifies patterns, divergences, and convergences in methodological approaches, shedding light on the intricate tapestry of Qur'anic exegesis in the South Asian context.Furthermore, the research critically assesses the role of socio-political factors in shaping interpretive methodologies, considering how historical events, colonial encounters, and contemporary challenges have influenced the lenses through which the Qur'an is interpreted. The study also investigates the interplay between traditional and modernist approaches, exploring the tension and dialogue between classical scholarship and contemporary reinterpretations in South Asian Qur'anic exegesis.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Arnold, J. (2000). Affect in language learning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Principles of language learning and teaching. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Cao, Yamin. (2010). A new course in English curriculum & language teaching. Nanjing: Jiangsu Education Publishing House.
Cheng, Xiaotang. (2009). An analysis of English teachers’ classroom discourse. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Deans Kerry (2002). “Communication in professional practice”. Pharmacist, Volume 21, Number 9, September 2002.
Ellis, R. (1999). Understanding second language acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Friedman, P. G. (1980). "Shyness and Reticence in Students." Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1980. Stock No. 1675-0-00. ED 181 520.
Fu, Li. (2008). A pragmatic study on the EFL classroom question-answer discourse. Beijing: Science Press.
Harmer, J. (2000). How to teach English. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 2000.
Jiang, Jingyang. (2006). Communicative activities in EFL classroom. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.
Mushtaq, M. (2014). Factor Affecting Communication of Pakistani Students. International Journal of English and Education, 3(1), 278-286.
Mabrito, M. (2000). Computer conversations and writing apprehension. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 39-49.
Scott, C. R., & Timmerman, C. E. (2005). Relating computer, communication, and computer- mediated communication apprehensions to new communication technology use in the workplace. Communication Research, 32(6), 683-725.V
Song, Deyun & Pan, Longming. (2000).Improving English teacher talk. Teaching English in
China. 23(4):51-54.
Al-Qalam December 2017 Influence of Teacher’s Use of Second Language ,P:149
Williams, M. & Burden, R. L. (2000). Psychology for language teachers. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.