INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND DECISION-MAKING IN CHALLENGING SITUATIONS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Undoubtedly, artificial intelligence is one of the great achievements for humans, which will have many applications in their lives. Artificial intelligence is the knowledge of knowing and designing intelligent agents, although the topic of artificial intelligence is very attractive, its challenges are equally important. One of the big challenges of humans is the decisions that artificial intelligence will make based on the results of its analysis. In this article, we have stated one of these challenges and using the HMT (Hyper Move Theory) method, we have stated a solution for it.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alaieri, F., & Vellino, A. (2016, November). Ethical decision making in robots: Autonomy, trust and responsibility. In International conference on social robotics (pp. 159-168). Springer, Cham.
Asaro, P. M. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 4(14), 20-24.
Askari, G., & Gordji, M. E. (2020). Decision making: rational choice or hyper-rational choice. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing, 8(2), 583-589.
Askari, G., Gordji, M. E., & Park, C. (2019). The behavioral model and game theory. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-8.
Bicchieri, C. (2004). RATIONALITY AND. The Oxford handbook of rationality, 182.
Brams, S. J. (1993). Theory of moves. American Scientist, 81(6), 562-570.
Brams, S. J., & Mattli, W. (1993). Theory of moves: overview and examples. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 12(2), 1-39.
Gibbons, R. (1992). A primer in game theory.
Ebrahimi Fard, M., & Eshaghi Gordji, M. (2023). A new model of the theory of moves based on hyper-rationality, Submitted.
Eshaghi Gordji, M., & Askari, G. (2017). Hyper-rational choice theory. Available at SSRN 3099441.
Eshaghi Gordji, M., & Askari, G. (2018). Hyper-rational choice and economic behaviour. Advances in mathematical finance and applications, 3(3), 69-76.
Eshaghi Gordji, M., Askari, G., & Park, C. (2019). A new behavioral model of rational choice in social dilemma game. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Cognition, 1(1), 42-50.
Gordji, M. E., & Askari, G. (2018). Hyper-rational choice theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10520.
Hew, P. C. (2014). Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies. Ethics and information technology, 16(3), 197-206.
Johnson, D. G. (2006). Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics and information technology, 8(4), 195-204.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
Kuflik, A. (1999). Computers in control: Rational transfer of authority or irresponsible abdication of autonomy?. Ethics and Information Technology, 1(3), 173-184.
Malle, B. F. (2016). Integrating robot ethics and machine morality: the study and design of moral competence in robots. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 243-256.
Morgenstern, O., & Von Neumann, J. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton university press.
Myerson, R. (1991). Game theory: Analysis of conflict harvard univ. Press, Cambridge, 3.
Noorman, M., & Johnson, D. G. (2014). Negotiating autonomy and responsibility in military robots. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 51-62.
Osborne, M. J. (2004). An introduction to game theory (Vol. 3, No. 3). New York: Oxford university press.
Osborne, M. J., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. MIT press.
Ross, D. (2001). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy: Game theory. Disponibile da https://plato. stanford. edu/entries/game-theory.
Tzafestas, S. G. (2016). Roboethics. A navigating overview. Heilberg: Springer.
Wallach, W. (2015). A dangerous master: How to keep technology from slipping beyond our control. Basic Books.