GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN QINGDAO
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were: 1) To study the current level of instructional leadership of secondary school teachers in Qingdao. 2) To develop the guidelines of instructional leadership of secondary school teachers in Qingdao. 3) To evaluate the adaptability and feasibility of instructional leadership of secondary school teachers in Qingdao. The sample group of this research was 291 teachers. The Interview group was 9 secondary school teachers in Qingdao and the evaluate 9 experts from secondary school in Qingdao. Research instruments include: 1) questionnaire. 2) semi-structured interview. 3) evaluation form. Data analysis by using percentage, mean, standard deviation and content analysis.
The results were: 1) the current situation of instructional leadership of secondary school teachers in Qingdao was at high level, 2) the guidelines for developing the instructional leadership of secondary school teachers in Qingdao in four aspects, which contain 23 articles. there are 6 guidelines for optimizing professional development, 6 guidelines for enhancing teaching practice, 5 guidelines for improving school culture, and 6 guidelines for promoting learn. 3) adaptability of guidelines for developing the instructional leadership of secondary school teachers in Qingdao in four aspects were at highest level. and feasibility of guidelines for developing the instructional leadership of secondary school teachers in Qingdao in four aspects were at high level.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Chen, Yi Jun. (2008). Analysis of the types of instructional leadership of junior high school teachers: A case study of secondary school teachers in Shanghai. Shanghai Education Research, (1), 33-35.
Fullan, M. (2012). Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons.
Han, Lai-Kyung. (2012). A study of teacher leadership in an online environment. Education and Career, (18), 69-71.
Lin Haiyan. (2006). New developments in the meaning of instructional leadership. Elementary and Middle School Management, (2), 38-39.
Li Qian (2009). Research on the connotation of teacher leadership. Modern Education Series (07), 65-70.
Li, Shao-Lin. (2018). The practice of informative instructional design in senior Chinese medicine concoction course. China Modern Distance Education of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 16(1), 24-27.
Li, S.. (2012). The basic connotation, characteristics and functions of sense teaching. Educational Theory and Practice: Primary and Secondary Education Teaching Edition, (7), 3-5.
Murphy, J. (2007). Teacher leadership: Barriers and supports. In International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 681-706). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Nie, Yujing. (2016). Current status of teacher leadership research in foreign countries. Modern Educational Science (04), 122-126. doi: 10.13980/j.cnki.xdjykx.2016.04.027.
Sun, J.. (2019). Action research and teacher professional development. Educational Research and Experimentation (01), 18-20.
Wu, Xiaoying. (2015). Dilemmas and breakthroughs in teacher instructional leadership generation. Chinese Journal of Education, 5, 71-75.
Xiao, Yueqiang & Yuan, Yongxin. (2011). Research on the construction of teacher leadership
in higher education institutions. Journal of National College of Education Administration (04), 66-70.
Yu, Wen-Cong. (2018). Role change of teacher leadership and its path exploration. Teaching
and Management (18), 48-50.
Zhao Decheng. (2016). Problems and Prospects in Instructional Leadership Research. Research on Foreign Education, 43(9), 60-70.
Zhao, Yuanke. (2017). Implications, Dilemmas and Generative Paths of Teacher Instructional
Leadership. Modern Primary and Secondary Education, 33(3), 83-85.