PERCEPTION AND PRACTICE DEFAMATION LAWS ACROSS JURISDICTIONS OF EUROPE AND AZERBAIJAN

Main Article Content

NISA HUSEYNZADA

Abstract

This article is dedicated to different and common characteristics of defamation laws in Europe and Azerbaijani jurisdiction from both practice and theory perceptions. The study focuses on the intricate interplay between human dignity, honor, and defamation law, striving to elucidate the tangible applications of these concepts within legal paradigms. Through a detailed examination of the deployment of human dignity and honor within the legal sphere, the research aims to uncover various legal perceptions that emphasize protecting these fundamental human values. The exploration is not limited to theoretical postulations but extends to the practical perspectives that shape legal constructs and decisions. By identifying diverse applications and interpretations of the concepts of human dignity and honor within different legal contexts, this analysis contributes to the broader understanding of how these notions are protected and manifested within the law.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

NISA HUSEYNZADA

NISA HUSEYNZADA

UNESCO Department of Human Rights and Information Law, Baku State University, Republic of Azerbaijan

References

United Nations General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx

Hu Yuhong (2017) An Analysis of the Legal Attributes of Human Dignity, Social Sciences in China, 38:3, 81-95, DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2017.1339442

Oprisko, R.L. (2012). Honor: A Phenomenology (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203110232Rosen, M. 2012. Dignity. Harvard University Press: Harvard.

M. (2012). Dignity - Michael Rosen. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674984059 Shulztiner, D., & Carmi, G. E. (2014). Human Dignity in National Constitutions: Functions, Promises and Dangers.The American Journal of Comparative Law, 62(2), 461–490. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43668212

George P. Smith, II. (2018). “Dignity in Living and in Dying”: The Henry H. H. Remak Memorial Lecture. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 25(1), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.25.1.0413

Lucy Michael (2014) Defining Dignity and Its Place in Human Rights, The New Bioethics, 20:1, 12-34, DOI: 10.1179/2050287714Z.00000000041

United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal Declaration of human rights (217 [III] A). Paris. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

Shulztiner, D., & Carmi, G. E. (2014). Human Dignity in National Constitutions: Functions, Promises and Dangers. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 62(2), 461–490. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43668212

Human Rights Act UK, (1998) https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/human-rights/human-rights-act

United Nations General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and political rights. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx

Hanna-Maria Niemi (2021) The Use of Human Dignity in Legal Argumentation: An Analysis of the Case Law of the Supreme Courts of Finland, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 39:3, 280-299, DOI: 10.1080/18918131.2021.1999576

Juncker, C. (2015). Refugee crisis must be first priority, says Juncker in 2015 State of EU Debate: News: European parliament. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/ en/headlines/eu-affairs/20150909STO92301/refugee-crisis-must-be-first-priority-says-juncker-in-2015-state-of-eu-debate

Pablo Gilabert (2020) Précis of Human Dignity and Human Rights, Journal of Global Ethics, 16:3, 283-287, DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2020.1861062

Germany (1949). Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. German Law Archive. https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/

Germany (1981). German Criminal Code, (1871). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/

French Press Law, (1881). https://legislationline.org/taxonomy/term/17578

Qerim Qerimi (2021) Dignity in transition: the constitutional and operational potential and limits of human dignity seen from the lens of post-conflict societies. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25:8, 1211-1232, DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2020.1816970

Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf

Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan, (1995). https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/az/az017en.pdf

Criminal Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan, (2000). http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/az/az017en.pdf

Civil Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan, (1999). https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=2577

Decision No. 7 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan, dated May 14, 1999. https://e-qanun.az/framework/17799

Decision No. 3 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan, dated February 21, 2014. https://supremecourt.gov.az/post/view/590