TAKEOVER CODE VIS A VIS CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING – A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA, USA, UK AND SINGAPORE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The title of the research paper “takeover code vis a vis corporate restructuring” brings the idea of the researcher to lay down different dimensions of the takeover code across the globe. The research paper aims to examine and compare take over codes of different countries. The countries, which are aimed by the researcher for the comparative study, are India, USA, UK and Singapore. The paper expresses different challenges in takeover codes of different countries. Conclusively, the paper enlightens the readers about the differences, similarities, gaps, challenges of takeover code among the targeted countries.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Books
Avtar Singh, (2009) Company Law, (15th ed. Eastern Book Company)
Articles and Reports (Including News Sources)
Sarkar J. and Sarkar S., (2012) “Corporate Governance in India” SAGE Publications.
Varottil U. (2015), Comparative Takeover Regulation and the Concept of Control, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies.
Raman S., (2016) Takeover Defenses In India, Corporate Law Reporter, Nov 20. http://corporatelawreporter.com/2016/11/20/takeover-defenses-in-india/. (Last access: 24/01/2022)
(2013)Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions in India- A transcription, National Law School of India Review, Vol. 24, No.2 (2013) Jstor, pp. 89-109
Sethi R., DhirS. and Agarwal D., (2015) National Law School of India Review, vol. 27 no. 2 (2015), JSTOR, pp 185-196
Armson E. “Models for Takeover Dispute Resolution: Australia and the UK”, 5(2) JCLS 401, at 402.
John H. Farrar, (1989). Business Judgment and Defensive Tactics in Hostile Takeover Bids, 15CAN. Bus. L.J. 15
Ferrarini G.& Geoffrey P. Miller (2009), A Simple Theory of Takeover Regulation in theUnited States and Europe, 42 CORNELL INT'l L.J. 301.
Hannes S., (2007) The Market for Takeover Defenses, 101 NW. U. L. REV. 125.
Alan J. A., Richard S. R. Mergers and Acquisitions, University of Chicago Press, 0-226-03209-4, : http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5821, pp-49-68.
Agrawal R, (2017) The New Takeover and Merger Code of Singapore, 4 CT. UNCOURT 11.
Gupta S.(2007) Regulation of Takeover Defenses: A Comparative Study of Buyback of Shares as a Takeover Defense. Student Bar Review, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 68–83. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/44308351.
Kumar PMV, (2007) Question of Control Under the Takeover Code, 79 CLA (Mag.) 12
Weston F, Mark L. Mitchell and Harold J. M., (2004) Takeovers, Restructuring and Corporate Governance (4th ed., New Delhi: Pearson Education), at p. 35-36.
Sampath P and Chandra N. E., (2000) The Takeover Code – Protection for the Shareholder38 CLA (Mag.) 164; Also see, Kishore R. Chhabaria v. Chairman, SEBI [2003] 46 SCL 385.
Dey J., (2007) Fiduciary duties in Takeovers, UK & Indian Laws: A comparison, p 9.
Press Statement dated 6thDecember 2001 of the Monetary Authority of Singapore available at www.mas.gov.sg visited on March 14 2022.
Kotak U Maybe it’s time for hostile takeovers; govt must back honest risks: UdayKotak. Moneycontrol. Available at: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/economy/maybe-its-time-for-hostile-takeovers-govt-must-back-honest-risks-uday-kotak-2244285.html (Last Accessed on April 10, 2022)”