Main Article Content



Since Nigeria gained its independence in 1960, the problem of creating suitable frameworks for the country's revenue allocation has dominated its socio-political landscape like a colossus. It's interesting to note that there seems to be agreement among certain scholars that federalism is a more commonly accepted political system for country like Nigeria because it is best adapted for the allocation and management of her huge but finite resources. Historical and descriptive research design was adopted. The data for this study is primarily derived from secondary sources, such as books, journals, newspapers, and the internet. The data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. It aims to suggest a new fair vertical income allocation strategy to the various tiers of government, as well as other critical stakeholders in the Nigerian state. It further contends that despite numerous concerted efforts, the various commissions charged with the onerous task of accomplishing this crucial task have not significantly reduced the polarisation surrounding this contentious issue, which has persisted in undermining the country's efforts to achieve real development. This study also makes the case that Nigeria's aspirations for equal resource distribution and development would remain unmet until serious efforts are made to rectify the perceived structural disparities in the allocation of state resource. Finally, this paper makes the case that solving the problems with income allocation and fiscal federalism is crucial for Nigeria's democracy as well as the country's general socioeconomic progress.


Article Details

Author Biography



Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, Veritas University, Abuja-Nigeria1

Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, Veritas University, Abuja-Nigeria 2


Abdul, B.M. (2019). Fiscal federalism and the question of return of looted assets and proceeds of crime.Being paper presented by at 1st Professor Jonah Isawa Elaigwu Annual Lecture on Saturday 27th April, 2019 at the Faculty of Arts Main Lecture Hall, Permanent Site, University of Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria.

Agranoff, R. (1996). (ed.) Federal evolution in Spain. International Political Science Review 17(4):385–401

Akujuru, C. A. (2015). Revenue allocation in Nigeria and the dependency on oil revenue: The need for alternative solutions Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.3, No.2, pp.19-36, February 2015

Alen, A. & Ergec, R. (1994). Federal Belgium after the Fourth State Reform of 1993. Brussels:

Min. Foreign Aff., Ext. Trade Dev. Coop.

Amuwo, K. Agbaje, A. Suberu, R. and Herault, G. (2003) (eds) Federalism and political

a. restructuring in Nigeria. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.

Appadorai, A. (1982) Substance of politics. Madrid: Oxford University Press.

Ball R, & Linn J. (1994). Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental transfers in less developed countries. Publius J. Fed. 24(1):1–19

Banting K.G., Brown, D.M., & Courchene, T.J. (1994). The future of fiscal federalism. Kingston, Ontario, Can: School Policy Study, Queen’s University

Beer, S.H. (1993). To make a nation: The rediscovery of American federalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press Harvard University.

Bird R. (1986). Federal finance in comparative perspective. Toronto: Can. Tax Found.

Boeckelman, K.A, & Kincaid, J. (eds.) (1996). Federal systems in the global economy. Publius J. Fed. Special issue 26(1)

Boothe P. (1996). (ed.) Reforming fiscal federalism for global competition: A Canada Australia comparison. Edmonton, Can.: University Alberta Press.

Breton, A. (1996). Competitive governments: An economic theory of politics and public finance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown DM, & Smith MG. (1991). Canadian federalism: Meeting global economic challenges. Kingston, Ontario, Canadian: Institute. Intergovernmental Relations. Queen’s University.

Buchanan JM. (1995). Federalism as an ideal political order and an objective for constitutional reform. Publius J. Fed. 25(2):19–27

Burgess M. (1995). The British Tradition of Federalism. London: Leicester University Press.

Burgess M, ed. (1996). Federalism and the European Union. Publius J. Fed. Spec. issue 26(4)

Burgess M, Gagnon A-G, eds. (1993). Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Bzdera A. (1993). Comparative analysis of federal high courts: a political theory of judicial review. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 26(1): 3–29

Cairns AC. (1992). Charter versus Federalism: the Dilemmas of Constitutional Reform,

ed. DE Williams. Montreal: McGillQueen’s University Press.

Christiansen T. (1996). Second thoughts on Europe’s third level: the European Union’s committee of regions. Publius J. Fed. 26(1):93–116

Coper M. (1989). The role of the courts in the preservation of federalism. Aust. Law J. 63(7):463–73

Cox, R.H. & Franklund, E.G. (1995). The federal state and the breakup of Czechoslovakia: an institutional analysis. Publius J. Fed. 25(1):71–88

de Villiers, B. (ed.) (1994). Evaluating federal systems. Cape Town, S. Afr: Juta & Co/

Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

DfID, (2009). DfID programme in Nigeria: Eight report of Session 2008-09 Volume 1 report, together with formal minutes. London: House of Commons International Development Committee.

Dikshit, R.D. (1975). The political geography of federalism. New York: Macmillan Co. India.

Dion, S. (1995). The dynamic of secessions: scenarios after a pro-separatist vote in a Quebec referendum. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 28(3): 533–51

Dorff RH. (1994). Federalism in Eastern Europe: part of the solution or part of the problem? Publius J. Fed. 24(2):99–114

Duchacek, I. (1987). Comparative federalism: The territorial dimension of politics. Lanham, MD: Univ. Press Am.

Duchacek, I. ed. (1988). Bicommunical societies and polities. Publius J. Fed. Special issue


Dye, T.R. (1990). American Federalism: Competition among governments. Lexington,

MA: Lexington Books Heath.

Elaigwu, J.I. and Akindele, R.A. (1996) (eds.) Foundation of Nigerian federalism: 1960-1995.

Vol. 3: National Council on Intergovernmental Relations, Abuja.

Elazar, D.J. (1984). American federalism: A view from the states. New York: Harper &

Row. 3rd ed.

Elazar, D.J. (1987). Exploring federalism. Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.

Elazar, D.J. (1990). Opening the third century of American federalism: issues and prospects. Ann. Am. Acad. Soc. Polit. Sci. 509:11–21

Elazar, D.J. (1993). International and comparative federalism. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. 26(2):


Elazar DJ. (1994a). Federalism and the way to peace. Kingston, Ontario, Can.: Inst. Intergov. Relat. Queen’s Univ. xi, 170 pp.

Elazar, D.J, ed. (1994b). Federal systems of the world. Harlow, UK: Longman Group. xxi,

pp. 2nd ed.

Elazar, DJ. (1994c). The American mosaic: The impact of space, time, and culture on American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Elazar, D.J. (1995). From statism to federalism: a paradigm shift. Publius J. Fed. 25(2): 5–18

Elazar, D.J. (ed.) (1996). New Trends in Federalism. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. Spec. issue 17(4)

Elazar, D.J. (1997). Contrasting unitary and federal systems. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 18(3):


Fleiner, T. & Schmitt, N. (eds.) (1996). Towards a European constitution: Europe and federal experiences. Fribourg, Switz.: Inst. du Fed. xxvi, 367 pp.

Forsyth, M. (1981). Unions of states: The theory and practice of confederation. Leicester, UK: Leicester Univ. Press. xii, 236 pp.

Forsyth, M. (ed.) (1989). Federalism and nationalism. Leicester, UK: Leicester Univ. Press.

Franck, T. (1966). Why federations fail: An inquiry into the requisites for a successful federation. New York: NY Univ. Press.

Friedrich, C.J. (1968). Trends of federalism in theory and Practice. New York: Praeger.

xii, 193 pp.

Gagnon, A.G. (1996). Quebec: From its nonrecognition as a nation qua distinct society

to its quest for a nation-state. Reg. Fed.Stud. 6(1):21–29

Galligan. B. (ed.) (1993). Federalism and the economy: International, National and

State Issues. Canberra: Fed. Res. Cent.,Austr. Natl. University

Galligan, B. (1995). A federal republic: Australia’s constitutional system of government. Oakleigh, Melbourne: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Gleason G. (1992). The federal formula and the collapse of the USSR. Publius J. Fed.


Gunlicks, A.B. (ed.) (1989). Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations in West Germany.

Publius. Spec. issue 19(4)

Gunlicks, A.B. (1994). German federalism after unification: the legal/constitutional response. Publius J. Fed. 24(2):81–98

Hesse, J.J. & Wright, V. (eds.) (1996). Federalizing Europe? The costs, benefits and conditions of federal political systems. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Hicks, U.K. (1978). Federalism: Failure and Success: A Comparative Study. London:


Higley, J. & Burton, M. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Higley, J. & Gunther, R. (eds) (1992) Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and

Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodgins, B.W., Eddy, J.J., Grant, S.D., & Struthers, J. (eds.) (1989). Federalism in Canada and Australia: Historical Perspectives 1920–1988. Peterborough: Frost Cent. Can. Herit. Dev. Stud., Trent University

Hooghe L, Marks G. 1996. Europe with regions: Channels of regional representation

in the European Union. Publius J. Fed. 26(1):73–91

Hrbek R. (1991). German federalism and the challenge of European integration. Jeffery,C., & Savigear, P. (eds.) In German federalism today, Leicester, UK: Leicester University. Press. pp. 84–102 &167

Jeffery, C. & Sturm, R. (eds.) (1992). Federalism, unification and European integration. Germ. Polit. Spec. issue 1(3)

Jega, A.M., (1996). “The political economy of Nigerian federalism”. In Elaigwu, J.I. & Akindele, R.A. (eds.) Foundations of Nigerian federalism: 1960- 1995. Abuja: National Council on Intergovernmental Relations. Vol.3

Kenyon, D.A. & Kincaid, J. (eds.) (1991). Competition among states and local governments: Efficiency and equity in American federalism. Washington, DC: Urban Inst.

Kincaid, J. (1990). From cooperative to coercive federalism. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. 509:


Kincaid, J. (1993). From cooperation to coercion in American federalism: housing, fragmentation and preemption 1780–1992. J. Law Polit. 9:333–430

Kincaid, J. (1995). Values and value trade offs in federalism. Publius J. Fed. 25(2):29–44

King P. (1982). Federalism and federation. London: Croom Helm.

Knop, K. Ostry, S. Simeon, R. & Swinton, K. (eds.) (1995). Rethinking federalism: Citizens,

markets and governments in a changing world. Vancouver: UBC Press 356 pp.

Laforest, G. & Brown, D. (eds.) (1994). Integration and fragmentation: The paradox of the

late twentieth century. Kingston, Ontario, Can.: Institute Intergovernmental Relations Queen’s University

Landau, M. (1973). Federalism, redundancy and system reliability. Publius J. Fed. 3(2):


Leonardy, U. (1993). Regionalism within federalism: the German constitution prepared

for European union. de Villiers, B. (ed.) In Evaluating Federal Systems, pp. 299–315.

Leslie, P.M. (1996). The Maastricht Model: A Canadian Perspective on the European

Union. Kingston, Ontario, Canadian Institute Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University.

Linz, J (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Lister, F.W. (1996). The European Union, the United Nations and the Revival of Confederal Governance. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

López, M. (2013). ‘Elite theory’, Sociopedia.isa, P: 1-12 DOI: 10.1177/2056846013112

Maclay M. (1992). Multi-speed Europe? The community beyond Maastricht. London:

R. Inst. Int. Aff.

MacManus, S. (1990). Financing federal, state and local governments in the 1990s. Ann.

Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 509:22–35

Madison, J., Hamilton, A., & Jay, J. (1987) (1788). The Federalist. New York: Penguin


Marc A. (1987). New and old federalism: faithful to the origins. Elazar, D.J (ed.) In Federalism as grand design: Political philosophies and the federal principle, Lanham, MD: Univ. Press Am. pp. 235– 248; 329

Marsh, I. & Uhr J. (eds.) (1995). Party systems, representation and policy making: Australian

trends in comparative perspective. Aust. J.Polit. Sci. Spec. issue 30

Michelman, H.J. & Soldatos P. (1994). European Integration: Theories and Approaches.

Lanham, MD: University Press Am.

Michels R (2009; 1915) Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Milne D. (1991). Equality or asymmetry: why choose? Watts, R.L & Brown, D.M (eds.) In Options for a New Canada, Toronto: University. Toronto Press Pp. 285–307.

Momoh, Z. and Rwang P.S. (2018).The politics of oil resources allocations in Nigeria(1999-2017) International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Review (IJSSHR) Vol.8 No 4 June 2018; P.142 – 150.

Morton, F.L. (1995). The effect of the charter of rights on Canadian federalism. Publius J.

Fed. 25(3):173–88

Mosca G (1939). The ruling class. London: McGraw Hill Book Company

Musa, A.and Hassan, A.N.(2014).An evaluation of the origins, structure and features of Nigerian federalism; Vol. 1Issue 05 Pg:314-325

Musgrave, R. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw Hill.

Nathan, R.P. (1992). Defining modern federalism. Scheiber, H.N (ed.) In North American and comparative federalism: Essays for the 1990s, Berkeley: University Califonia Press pp. 89–99.

Nathan, R.P, & Lago, J.R. (1990). Intergovernmental fiscal roles and relations. Ann. Am. Acad.

Polit. Soc. Sci. 509:36–47

Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.

Olson, D.M. & Franks, C.E.S. (eds.) (1993). Representation and policy formation in federal

systems. Berkeley: Inst. Gov. Stud. Univ. Calif. Berkeley.

Omitola, B. (2016). The politics of fiscal federalism and the challenges of development in Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 169-186.

Osaghae, E.E. (1990). A reassessment of federalism as a degree of decentralization. Publius J. Fed.20(1):83–98

Ostrom V. (1991). The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society. San Francisco: Inst. Contemporary Studies.

Ostrom V. (1995). Where to begin. Publius J. Fed. 25(2):45–60

Oyediran, O., Nwosu, Takaya, B., Anifowose, R., Badejo, Ogboghodo and Agbaje, A. (2008). (eds) New approach to government. Ikeja: Longman Nigeria Plc.

Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society. London:Jonathan Cape Limited.

Pennock, J.R. (1959). Federal and unitary government—disharmony and reliability. Behavioral Science 4(2):147–57

Peterson, P.E. (1995). The price of federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute

Pittenger, J.C. (1992). Garcia and the political safeguards of federalism: is there a better

solution to the conundrum of the tenth amendment? Publius J. Fed. 22(1):1–19

Riker, W.H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, operation, significance. Boston: Little, Brown.

Riker, W.H. (1975). Federalism. Polsby, N.W. & Greenstein, F.I. (eds.) In Handbook of political science: Governmental institutions and processes. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Riker, W.H. (1987). The development of American federalism. Boston: Kluwer Acad.

Russell, P.H, Knopff, R. & Morton, T. (1989). Federalism and the charter: Leading constitutional decisions, A New Edition. Ottawa, Can.: Carleton Univ. Press. 805 pp.

Russell, P.H. (1993). Constitutional odyssey: Can Canadians become a sovereign people? Toronto: University Toronto Press. x, 316 pp. 2nd ed.

Saunders C. (1989). The constitutional framework: Hybrid, derivative but Australian.

Melbourne: Cent. Const. Stud. University Melbourne.

Saunders C. (1995). Constitutional arrangements of federal systems. Publius J. Fed.


Scharpf F. (1988). The joint decision-trap: lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration 66:238–78

Sharman, C. (ed.) (1994). Parties and federalism in Canada and Australia. Canberra: Fed.

Res. Cent. Aust. National. University

Simeon, R. & Robinson, I. (1990). State, society, and the development of Canadian federalism. Toronto: University Toronto Press.

Smiley, D.V. & Watts, R.L. (1985). Instrastate federalism in Canada. Toronto: University. Toronto Press.

Sproule-Jones, M. (1993). Governments at work: Canadian Parliamentary federalism and its public policy effects. Toronto: University. Toronto Press.

Stewart, W.H. (1984). Concepts of federalism. New York: Univ. Press Am., Cent. Stud.


Tamuno, T. N. (2003). “Nigerian federalism in historial perspective”. In Amuwo, K. et al (ed.)

Federalism and political restructuring in Nigeria. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.

Tarlton, C.D. (1965). Symmetry and asymmetry as elements of federalism: A theoretical

speculation. J. Polit. 27(4):861–74

Ter-Minassian, T. (1997). Fiscal federalism in theory and practice. Washington: International

Monetary Fund

UNDAF, (2013) United Nations development assistance framework Nigeria–UNDAF 111 (2014-2017) New York: United Nations

UNDP, (2014) UNDP Nigeria Annual Report 2014 Abuja: UNDP /undpnigeria- annual report-2014/ retrieved on 11/09/2015 01:01pm.

Verney, D.V. (1995). Federalism, federative systems, and federations: the United States,

Canada and India. Publius J. Fed. 25(2): 81–97

Walker, D.B. (1995). The rebirth of federalism: Slouching towards Washington.

Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

Walsh C. (1992). Fiscal federalism: An overview of issues and discussion of their

relevance to the European Community. Canberra: Fed. Res. Cent., Aust. National


Walsh, C. & Jeff, P. (1992). Fiscal federalism. An overview of issues and a discussion of their relevance to the European Community. Canberra: Federalism Research Centre.

Warhurst J. (1987). Managing intergovernmental relations. Bakvis, H & Chandler, W.M (eds.) In Federalism and the role of the State, Toronto: University. Toronto Press Pp.259–276 and 318

Watts, R.L. (1977). The survival and disintegration of federations. Simeon, R. (ed.) In Must Canada Fail?, Montreal:McGill-Queen’s University Press pp. 42–62.

Watts, R.L. (1981). Federalism, regionalism, and political integration. In Regionalism and

Supranationalism, ed. D Cameron, pp. 3–19. Montreal: Inst. Res. Publ. Policy

Watts, R.L. (1987). Divergence and convergence: Canadian and US federalism. Scheiber, H.N (ed.) In Perspectives on federalism: Papers from the First Berkeley Seminar on Federalism, Berkeley: Inst.Gov. Stud. University California. Berkeley pp. 179–213.

Watts RL. (1989). Executive federalism: A comparative analysis. Kingston: Instit.

Intergov. Relat. Queen’s University

Weaver, R.K, (ed.) (1992). The collapse of Canada? Washington, DC: Brookings Institute

Weber M (2005 1922). Economia y sociedad. Mexico DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Watts, R.L. (1996). Comparing federal systems in the 1990s. Kingston: Inst. Intergovernmental Relations. McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press.

Watts, L.R. (1998). Federalism, federal political systems, and federations Annual Review of Political Science. 1998. 1:117–137

Weingast, B. (1995). “The role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and

economic development,” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1.

Wheare, K.C. (1963). Federal government. 4th ed. London: Oxford University Press.

Wiessner, S. (1993). Federalism: an architecture for freedom. Eur. Law Rev. 1(2):129–42

Wood, M., Williams, C., & Sharman, C. (eds.) (1989). Governing federations: Constitution,

politics, resources. Sydney: Hale & Iremonger.

Wright D. (1982). Understanding intergovernmental relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/

Cole. 2nd ed. P: 532

Yamokoski, A. & Dubrow, J.K. (2008). How do elites define influence? Personality and respect as sources of social power. Sociological Focus 41(4): 319–36.

Young, R.A. (1995). The secession of Quebec and the future of Canada. Montreal:

McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Zimmerman, J.F. (1992). Contemporary American federalism: The growth of national

power. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.

Zimmerman, J.F. (ed.) (1993). Federal pre-emption. Publius J. Fed. Spec. issue 23(4)