Main Article Content



The relationship between the US and Pakistan has always been defined by the shifts in international system in terms of major events. Pakistan has always been dependent on the United States for economic, military, and technological support due to its strategic arms race with India, which is a regional power in South Asia. The United States, on the other hand, was interested in keeping security relationship with Pakistan in order to reduce the influence of the Soviet Union in the region. India has historically been closer ally of the Soviet due to the socialist leaning of its ruling party; The Congress. It had always resisted strategic relationship with Washington, which had provided an opportunity to Islamabad to get maximum benefit from the United States’ policy of containment in South Asia. Islamabad became the frontline ally of the US in its policy of containment during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. The Afghan crisis period during the Cold War was the only phase when the bilateral relationship had reached the level of strategic one. The United States had given significant military and economic assistance to Pakistan and Islamabad had also immensely assisted the Afghan Mujahideen against the Soviet Union. This strategic relationship did not continue after the Afghan war and was followed by a period of negligence, economic and military sanctions and political indifference.    

This paper specifically discusses the trend in the bilateral relationship since the beginning and identifies the major factors that have kept the relationship roller coaster. This paper contains seven sections by discussing the nature of relationship in different decades since its establishment in 1947. The first phase was the period establishing the relationship, which was aimed at the containment of Soviet influence in the region. The second decade was defined by the emergence of political differences and direction of the two countries on major issues. The third decade is considered the period of miscommunication and disappointments. The fourth was reached the desired level when their strategic interests aligned in Afghanistan. It again was followed by the period of sanctions and indifferences because of the emergence of New World Order, when the United States decided to focus on non-traditional issues like terrorism, nuclear proliferation, human rights and democracy. The final phase was the period after the event of 9/11, when Pakistan was faced with the option of either with us or against us. The primary factor in the bilateral relationship was the nature of international system, which kept influencing the bilateral relationship. It shows that they are transactional partners, which is highly dependent upon the nature of international system, not strategic one, which is above the influence of changes in the system. 

Article Details

Author Biography



1Dr. Fida Bazai is Assistant Professor in Department of International Relations, University of Balochistan. He did his MS and PhD from University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

2Amjad Rashid is a PhD Scholar in Department of International Relations, University of Balochistan, Quetta.

3Muhammad Muzamil is PhD Scholar in Department of International Relations, University of Balochistan, Quetta.

4Ms Faiza Mir is lecturer in Department of International Relations, University of Balochistan, Quetta.

5Dr. Ruqia Rehman did her PhD in Disaster Management from the University of Balochistan, Quetta. She is Assistant Professor in Department of Statistics, University of Balochistan, Quetta.

6Mr. Ghulam Dasthagir is Lecturer in Department of International Relations, University of Balochistan, Quetta.


Abbasi, S. (2019). 22 loans in 61 years: Pakistan’s unwavering habit of going to the IMF.

Afridi, S. (2011, November 30). Pakistan-US relations. Retrieved from

Afzal, M. (2020, October 26). Evaluating the Trump administration’s Pakistan reset. Retrieved from

Ahmad, D. E. (2012). Pakistan, the United States and the IMF: Great game or a curious case of Dutch Disease without the oil? . SIA RESEARCH CENTRE.

Ahmed, J. (2004). Pakistan's Political, Economic & Diplomatic Dynamics. Kitabistan Paper Products.

Akhtar, S. (2012). Dynamics of USA-Pakistan relations in post 9/11. International Journal of Humanities, 205-213.

Amanda Shendruk, L. H. (2020). Funding the United Nations: What Impact Do U.S. Contributions Have on UN Agencies and Programs? COUNCIL on FOREIGN RELATIONS.

America, t. P. (2017, December 11). Recognizing Jerusalem as the Capital of the State of Israel and Relocating the United States Embassy to Israel to Jerusalem. Retrieved from

Annan, K. (2004, September 16). Iraq war illegal, says Annan. Retrieved from

Bach, N. (2019, January 11). Why the World Bank President Has Always Been an American. Retrieved from

Background And Objectives Of Bretton Woods Economics . (2015, march 23). Retrieved july 23, 2017, from

Baxter, C. (1991). The United States and Pakistan: The Zia Era and the Afghan Connection. Foreign Policy Research Institute .

Birnback, E. C. (1994). For the Common Good:The U.S. Role in theUnited Nations. National Council for the Social Studies, 407-409.

Butt, S. A. (2019). Exploring Pakistan. Lahore: Ahad publishers.

Chatzky, J. M. (2020). The IMF: The World’s Controversial Financial Firefighter. Council on Foreign Relations.

Cheema, Q. (2021). Pak-US ties during Trump presidency. TNS the news on sunday.

Cooper, R. (1984). Is there a need for reform? . hamsphire.

Foot, R., MacFarlane, S. N., & Mastanduno, M. (2003). US hegemony in an organized world:the United States and multilateral institutions. Oxford University Press.

Gordon Gray, T. W. (2018). U.S. Participation in the International Monetary Fund (IMF): A Primer. American Action Forum.

Hasnat, S. F. (2011). Pakistan - U.S. Relations on Slippery Grounds: An Account of Trust and its. Pakistan Vision.

Hassan, M. (2019, July 20). Gaza Killings: who blame?

Husain, K. (2015). Pakistan and the IMF: The ties that bind. Dawn.

Jaffrelot, C. (2016). Pakistan at the Crossroads: Domestic Dynamics and External Pressures. New York: Columbia University Press.

Jeet, H. (2018). Are We Witnessing the Fall of the American Empire? The New Republic.

Khalil, A. k. (2016). the role of IMF in Pakistan's economy. Bulletin of Business and Economics.

Kronstadt, K. A. (2012). Pakistan-U.S. Relations. Washington: Congressional Research Service.

Kux, D. (2001). The United States and Pakistan, 1947-2000; Disenchanted Allies. Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2001.

Momani, B. (2004). The IMF,the U.S war on terrorism and Pakistan. Taylor and Francis,Ltd.

Muhammad Asif Malik, M. H. (2014). Foreign Policy Analysis (Pakistan in world affairs). Lahore: Publisher Emporium.

Muhammad Subtain, M. H. (2016). Dimensions of Pakistan's Foreign Policy: From inception to the 9/11 incident (1947-2001)-An analytical study. ResearchGate, 61-65.

Peet, R. (2010). Unholy trinity:The IMF,World Bank and WTO. London: zed book ltd.

Sanford, J. E. (2013). International Monetary Fund:organization,functions and role in the international economy. Not identified.

SAV Explainer: U.S. response to South Asia’s 1998 Nuclear tests. (2018). South Asian Voices.

Security, I. (2014). Drone Wars Pakistan: Analysis. CNA Report.

Shah, S. (2018). Pakistan has borrowed 21 times from IMF since Dec 8, 1958. the News.

Shahi, A. (1988). Pakistan's Security and Foreign Policy. Progressive Publishers.

Staff, R. (2018, July 31). U.S.' Pompeo warns against IMF bailout for Pakistan that aids China. Reuters Staff. Retrieved from

Willett, G. B. (2004). IMF Conditionality, Implementation and the New Political Economy of Ownership. Comparative Economic Studies.

Wirsing, R. G. (2010). Precarious Partnership: Pakistan's Response to U.S. Security Policies. AsianAffairs: An American Review , 70-78 .