THE ADMINISTRATION MANAGEMENT REFORM STRATEGY OF GUANGXI UNIVERSITIES UNDER THE CONCEPT OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION

Main Article Content

OU ZHIHUA, JITTAWISUT WIMUTTIPANYA, NIRAN SUTHEENIRAN, PATCHARA DECHHOME, SARAYUTH SETHAKHAJORN, TEERAWAT MONTAISONG, WIROT WATANANIMITGUL

Abstract

This research to study research on the Strategy of Administrative Management Reform in Guangxi Colleges and Universities under the concept of Innovative Education. Assess research on the Strategy of Administrative Management Reform in Guangxi Colleges and Universities under the concept of Innovative Education. Guide research on the Strategy of Administrative Management Reform in Guangxi Colleges and Universities under the concept of Innovative Education.


This research used Mixed Method of Research. This research is divided into 3 phases:


Phase 1 To study research on the Strategy of Administrative Management Reform in Guangxi Colleges and Universities under the concept of Innovative Education.


Phase 2 To assess research on the Strategy of Administrative Management Reform in Guangxi Colleges and Universities under the concept of Innovative Education.


Phase 3 To guide research on the Strategy of Administrative Management Reform in Guangxi Colleges and Universities under the concept of Innovative Education.


On the basis of existing research, this paper explains the connotation of innovative education concept and university management reform strategy, and obtains the influencing factors of university management reform strategy and school management level, faculty team construction, administrative work status, performance evaluation and administrative supervision, etc. At the same time, eight specific variables under four dimensions are obtained: advanced management innovation concept and scientific thought.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

OU ZHIHUA, JITTAWISUT WIMUTTIPANYA, NIRAN SUTHEENIRAN, PATCHARA DECHHOME, SARAYUTH SETHAKHAJORN, TEERAWAT MONTAISONG, WIROT WATANANIMITGUL

OU ZHIHUA 1, ASSOC.PROF.DR. JITTAWISUT WIMUTTIPANYA2, ASSOC.PROF.DR. NIRAN SUTHEENIRAN3, ASST. PROF. DR. PATCHARA DECHHOME4, ASST. PROF. DR. SARAYUTH SETHAKHAJORN5, ASST. PROF. DR. TEERAWAT MONTAISONG6, PROFESSOR DR. WIROT WATANANIMITGUL7

1Doctoral Candidate, BSRU, Thailand.

2Faculty of Education, BSRU, Thailand.

3Faculty of Education, BSRU, Thailand.

4Faculty of Education, BSRU, Thailand.

5Faculty of Education, BSRU, Thailand.

7Faculty of Education, BSRU, Thailand.

References

Bruner, L.S. 1969. The Process of Education. Massachusetts: Hayward University Press Cambridge.

Carl Rogers. (1951). Client – Centered Therapy.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Gardner, Howord . (1993). Multiple Intelligence : The Theory in Pratice . New York : Basic Books.

Giovanni,S. (2012). Managing knowledge for business performance improvement. Journal of Organization, (10), 17-39.

Huo Liyan. (2017). The Early Learning and Development Guidelines in China: Retrospective and Prospective Views. DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-2207-4_11.

Maslow, A.H. (1970). Motivation and personality. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.

Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person: A Therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Hough Mifflin.

UNESCO. (1998) Bulletin of the UNESCO Regional office for Education in Asia and The Pacific (Special Issue): UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Instructional Implication, and Applications of Social Stoical Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Yang Zhang. (2023) Didactical considerations for further education learning factories: A three case study. Abstract from 13th Conference on Learning Factories, Reutlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.