A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DELAYING THE AUCTION OF AN ASSET
Main Article Content
Abstract
Within the framework of the Ecuadorian legal system, civil legislation establishes that the creditor has the power to request, within the executive process, actions that lead to the collection of the debt. In this sense, once the corresponding legal procedure has been initiated and in the course of the execution, when the seizure of an asset has been decreed, it is auctioned. Previously, such property is evaluated by an authorized expert of recognized integrity, who makes an appraisal in accordance with the rules that support his expert report. However, in some cases, it is possible that the seized property is not finally auctioned, which may result in a second and even a third auction. If there are no bidders after these attempts, the plaintiff has two options: to request the seizure of another property or to request a new appraisal of the seized property. Precisely, the issue of the retasa is the main focus of this article, since, after reviewing the rules that could regulate it, it has been noted the lack of its specific regulation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Code of Civil Procedure
Code of Civil Procedure
Code of Civil Procedure
Code of Civil Procedure
G. Cabanellas "Diccionario de Derecho Usual" Tomo V, Editorial Heliasta S.A. Buenos Aires 1979
Presidency of the National Court of Justice. Acquittal of Consultations. Non-binding criterion. https://www.cortenacional.gob.ec/cnj/images/pdf/consultas_absueltas/No_Penales/Civil/039.pdf
Article 1 of RESOLUTION No. 052022
General Code of Processes, article 221
Regulation of the Integral Expert System of the Judicial Function, Chapter IV, article 23, numeral 3
https://www.cimec.es/metodos-cientificos-diferentes/#Metodo_deductivo_-_inductivo
Cruz, M. (2019). Order for payment procedure in the General Organic Code of Processes. Law Review, 32(2), 156-173.
Gonzalez, R. (2017). Executive judgment in the Ecuadorian Code of Civil Procedure. Annals of Law, 35(2), 234-250.