Main Article Content



Intellectual Property Rights is considered to be a legal right which is granted to the person who is considered to be the originator or the composer of an original work or invention for a stipulated period of time. In the modernized world, along with the tangible assets, intangible assets also play a vital role. All types of IP rights are considered to be an intangible asset. Protecting these IP Rights is an essential part in business. It is the responsibility of the owner to protect his business IP rights.  IP related lawsuits are initially filed in District Court, with appeal to the High Court. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a process used to resolve conflicts outside of the judicial system. The mechanism of arbitration will have legal obligation on the parties whereas the Mediation procedure is not so. Arbitration and Mediation process is used in IP related disputes which will be helpful for speedy disposal of the case and it is cost efficient to the parties which is one of the advantages to the parties. Disputes dealing with Business, Trade, Commerce and contracts, family related disputes, tortious liability can be sorted through ADR process. Similarly, ADR Process is used to solve IP Related disputes also. In order to disburden the judiciary from pending IP cases and for rendering justice without many complications, lawsuit can be filed through ADR mechanism. Based in Geneva, Switzerland, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre was established in the year of 1994 with the aim to solve the intellectual property disputes through ADR Mechanism. The author will be highlighting the comparative analysis of ADR process with US and UK. 

Article Details

Author Biography






Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 89(1) Settlement of disputes outside the court, No 5 Act of Parliament, 1908. (INDIA)

Afcons Infrastructure Ltd & Anr vs Cherian Varkey Construction Company Pvt. Ltd & Ors (2010 (8) SCC 24)

Jagdish Prasad vs Parmeshwar Prasad AIR 1966 Pat 33

Section 2(1) (J) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970

Darius Rutton vs Gharda Chemicals (2019) 14 SCC 277

Firm Koonerji Bechari Lal vs Firm Adam Haji Pir Mohammed AIR 1944 SIND 21

Art. 22 of Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 39, No. 26 Act of Parliament, 1996 (INDIA)

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 34, No. 26 Act of Parliament, 1996 (INDIA)

Eros International Media Ltd vs Telemax Links India Pvt Ltd 2016 (6) ARBLR 121 (BOM)

The Patent Act, 1970, Section 103 (5), No. 39 Act of Parliament, 1970 (INDIA)

WIPO, A Cost Effective Alternative,

Article 2(1) of the Berne Convention for the protection of literary and artistic work

Bawa Masala Co. vs Bawa Masala Co. Pvt Ltd & Anr AIR (2008) 149 PLR 38

Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc vs SBI Home Finance Ltd & Ors AIR 2011 SC 2507

Eros International Media Ltd vs Telemax Links India Pvt. Ltd & Ors 2016 (6) ARBLR 121 (BOM)

Lomax vs Lomax (2019) 1 WLR 6527

Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, 1996, Section 572 (a), (UNITED STATES)

United Patents Act, 1977, Section 52 (5) (UNITED STATES)

Elders CED vs Dravco Corp. (1984) 59 ALR 206

Larkden Pty Ltd vs Lloyd Energy Systems Pty Ltd (2011) NSWSC 268

International Arbitration Act, 1974, Section 11(1)

Singapore Limitation Act, 1959, Section 6 (SINGAPORE)

Foreign Limitation Period Act, 1984, Section 3 (UNITED KINGDOM)

German Patent Act, 1980, Section 15 (GERMANY)

German Code of Civil Procedure, 1877, Section 1062 (1) (GERMANY)

Afcons Infrastructure Limited and Another V. Cherian Varkey Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. And others (2010) 8 SCC 24